[Users] BC-SOAP does not forward the error message

Christophe DENEUX [via Petals Forums] ml-node+s974793n4025261h65 at n3.nabble.com
Tue Aug 21 10:30:40 CEST 2012



IMO:
  - Only a ACK (Done or Error) can be returned with the InOnly pattern in
JBI. No fault is supported by the InOnly pattern.
  - So if you have a service provider that does not return customized fault
(fault defined in the WSDL), you can use the InOnly pattern, the error
should be transformed in a generic fault on the consumer side,
  - If you have a service provider that returns customized fault, you MUST
use the pattern RobustInOnly
  - RobustInOnly is the good choice to map to the one-way pattern of WS

I think that the InOnly pattern of the JBI world is designed for non
blocking calls. The consumer sends its request to its provider. The provider
acknowledges the received message and process it (if an error occurs, the
provider MUST provides a retry system). The consumer can continue its
execution during the process of the request on the provider side.



-----
Christophe DENEUX
Linagora
Twitter: @ChrisDENEUX
_______________________________________________
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://forum.petalslink.com/BC-SOAP-does-not-forward-the-error-message-tp4025239p4025261.html
To start a new topic under Users (get help, provide help), email ml-node+s974793n2681628h42 at n3.nabble.com
To unsubscribe from Users (get help, provide help), visit http://forum.petalslink.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=2681628&code=dXNlcnNAZm9ydW0ucGV0YWxzbGluay5vcmd8MjY4MTYyOHwtOTE3MDU0NjU4
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://forum-list.petalslink.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120821/f1e4196c/attachment.html>


More information about the Users mailing list