[General] Any experience with large attachment in an SOA platform ?

[ccasadei]

Hi, 

Actually, I didn't remember the configuration I was using at the time...the only thing I can remember is that I was working with 64bits VM on the server side. I should retry this, and in fact I will, since, for a client project, we need to know what is the maximum amount of data we can pass per request with an acceptable delay for *almost* real time user manipulation.


cdeneux wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Are you sure ? It seems to me that the attachments are stored only memory when they are exchanged betwwen containers. So you need to set your heap max size to a very big value to be able to exchange� few Gb. And on 32bits systems you it should not be possible to set the heap over 2Gb ?
> 
> Christophe
> 
> 
> 
> 2010/4/24 ccasadei <charles.casadei at gmail.com (charles.casadei at gmail.com)>
> 
> >  	 	Last year when I was writing the BC-SFTP component, I tested it with huge files attachements such a VM image (a few Gb of data if I remember well), in distributed mode (between a mac acting as SFTP server with a Petals ESB node on it and a Linux station with another Petals ESB node with a Filetransfer consume), and I never encountered any problem. The only big problem with file attachements is connection loss between the two petals node...
> > 	
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 	
> > 
> 
> 
>  --Posted via petals mailing-list (http://forum.petalslink.com/m2f_usercp.php)--





-------------------- m2f --------------------

Subscribe/Unsubscribe emails notifications.

Response to this email will be posted on the Petals forum.
Please delete the existing text before responding :)

Read the topic online:
http://forum.petalslink.com/viewtopic.php?p=30920#30920

-------------------- m2f --------------------


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://forum-list.petalslink.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20110316/1f1397cf/attachment.htm>