[Users] JMX connection to PEtALS

[sandre]

rnaudin wrote:
> It's true that we can want to use an 'admin' network interface that is not the 'production'network interface.
> So we can introduce a 'adminhostname' in the topology.



Actually I needed this feature for a benchmark purpose, because we don't have access to the servers and the jconsole runs
on our desktop computers, which are not on the same network. So there are at least two use-cases were it would be usefull.

I'd like to have

Code:
<complexType name="JmxService">
      <all>
         <element name="rmi-address" type="string" maxOccurs="1" minOccurs="0" />
         <element name="rmi-port" type="int" maxOccurs="1" minOccurs="1" />
      </all>
</complexType>




Should I add a feature request?




-------------------- m2f --------------------

Read this forum topic online here:
http://petals.ebmwebsourcing.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=918#918

-------------------- m2f --------------------


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://forum-list.petalslink.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110316/201198d6/attachment.htm>